Opinions Gordon ReidA Comment -- General Comments From an ExpertA CommentaryN/AAug 26, 2015
You might be interested:
;fill-opacity:1;'/%3e%3cpath%20d='M31%2018.6001V30H8V18.6001L14.1334%2022.4334L19.4999%2014L24.8669%2022.4334L31%2018.6001Z'%20fill='%23EE5432'%20style='fill:%23EE5432;fill:color(display-p3%200.9340%200.3310%200.1956);fill-opacity:1;'/%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
Premium content
Leverage and credit expansion
Leverage is often blamed for the 1987 stock market crash, about 38 years ago. Rising use of borrowed money, such as margin debt in equities or high loan-to-value ratios in real estate, amplifies gains during bull phases and magnifies losses afterward. Easy credit or relaxed lending standards frequently accompany bubbles. Currently, there is a lot of concern about margin debt. According to the U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), margin debt is at about US$1.1 trillion. Sure, it is a big number, and is at a record. It represents two per cent of total S&P 500 market value, and is up 35 per cent in the past year. But again, it may not be as bad as it sounds. The S&P 500 is up about 15 per cent in the past year so some margin expansion is expected. Lower interest rates also help investors manage their debt exposure. And, two per cent of the S&P 500 does not sound like a lot, considering expected earnings growth forecasts in the 10 per cent or more range for next year. Still, margin debt is certainly something to watch, and may be a sign of future troubles.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
Watching for US Treasury announcements this week on quarterly refinancing needs. Appears requirements will be less than originally planned for. Upcoming US Fed meeting will also be indicative of US economy. If US Fed starts to issue more bonds than expected, not a good sign for markets (need to raise capital is bad). Widely expected that US Fed will keep rates flat, and appears rate cuts are on the horizon. Reduction of US Fed balance sheet will also be interesting to watch. Upcoming earnings from big tech companies will be defining on direction of markets (could break momentum of markets).
Best place to get growth in portfolio that is not tech oriented is ETF called PAVE. Offers investors an option to get infrastructure spending exposure. As globalization reduces, more spending will occur "at home" in North America. Bricks & mortal syple business' also provide traditional cash flows. Not a cheap valuation, but would recommend buying on share price weakness. PAVE ETF also pays a nice dividend yield for defensive investors.
Case for Owning Equities Over the Long Term:
This might make the prophets of doom quiver a bit. We ran a Bloomberg screen this week, using Jan. 9’s closing market prices, on every stock in North America. The market at that time had been open for a grand total of six trading days, yet we found 21 stocks that were up more than 20 per cent this year, ranging from a high of 106 per cent for Athena Bitcoin Global to 20.6 per cent for Structure Therapeutics Inc. Since we are on the topic of pie-in-the-sky news, how about annualizing those returns? Wow, that would be something.
For our screen, we only used companies with a market capitalization of more than $100 million. The two companies noted above are more than $1 billion each. If we take off our market cap restriction, we get even more early winners.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
Garner predicts a surprising but sharp uptick in grain prices though agriculture has been hated. Tech has made farmers more efficient. New production came online after the grain shortage following Russia's initial invasion of Ukraine. But demand from China has softened. However, the bears/pessimists have sold by now until we're now seeing a floor/bottom. Garner predicts corn rally to $5.50. Don't buy wheat now, only on dips. He expects wheat to rally with corn. Wheat's chart shows an inverse head-and-shoulders, so wheat is pointing up and could rebound to the neckline of $6.60; a breakout could touch $7.60. Soybeans could see short-term weakness, but a breakout past $13 could see the price reach $14, and can bottom at $11-11.80.
Historically it is a good sign that U.S. markets keep hitting record highs after 18 months of not making new highs. Also we are in an election year after a negative mid-term (presidential) market. This is good too, historically. There has been 5 new net term highs in January which predicts well for the rest of the year. A number of global markets have woken up after 15 years, including Japan after 30 years. There is a substantial improvement of the breadth of the market and in putting new money to work. Along these lines there could be a fair bit of money coming back into Canadian stocks. Also there are a lot of Canadian companies not just focused on the Canadian domestic economy, especially in industrials. Latin America and parts of Asia are interesting - not just the U.S. U.S. earnings are improving after a contraction - could be up 15% by the 4th quarter. There are corporations and individuals with high cash rates.
Markets. Feels we are in a little bit of No Man’s land and that we are in the later innings of the correction. Corrections are always defined by extent, time, duration, percentage, etc. and he looks at it a little differently. He wants a Correction to have the effect that it is intended to have, i.e. to basically weed out the weak holders in the market, to remind everybody that equities is a risk phased asset and that the risk/reward is intact. Thinks this one is having that affect. What we normally see in Bull Market corrections are the short, sharp corrections versus the Bear Market effect of just wearing you out. This is showing all the markings of a Bull Market correction, with the extreme volatility, reversals, volume fluctuations, etc. We may have a little bit more to go, but he would remind everyone that equities are long term assets, so keep your eye on the horizon and don’t sell into this through any form of panic. This isn’t the end of anything, this is normal. We can move to new highs, but investors have to be selective. Rather than looking at percentages of the depletion of their various stocks, they should be looking at fundamentals. Do they have real growth of revenues, cash flow and earnings? That is going to be the thing that will allow these stock prices to move higher. Just the fact that they have corrected 10% or 20%, doesn’t give them the right to move to a new high.