50% off Premium Yearly
Advantage of DIY Investor: It doesn’t have to look good to anyone else. If you’re starting to get a sense of how difficult it is for professional investors to make good decisions, you’re on the right track. Here’s one more subtle but important point: It is far easier to sell a portfolio if it contains long-term winners, even if the fund hasn’t held those winners for very long. This is one reason professional investors often sell out of underperforming assets (sell low) and buy into hot stocks (buy high). When you are forced to consider the optics of your behaviour, it is often easier to justify conformity and failure than unpopular positions with a higher chance of success. The portfolios of DIY investors only need to look good to themselves.
Today's 25-basis point hike was right. There may be another if inflation doesn't cool off. The banking crisis has created two markets: one that needs a clean bill of health in financials, and the other in fastest-growing stocks, meaning tech. it doesn't help that Janet Yellen reassured markets over the bank crisis, but today withdrew that.
She hopes bank uncertainty will be contained. The big banks have the capital and liquidity to help the smaller ones. She never owned regional banks, just large ones. We have been seeing a flight to safety to the big banks. We'll see stricter regulations among ALL banks. All this equals a hike in interest rates. Bond rates have plummetted. Investors foresee a slowing economy. But there will be less need to raise rates. See what the US Fed announces tomorrow.
Canada in good shape financially from banking perspective (no small regional banks).
Confidence in Canadian banks is justified.
Believes UBS/Credit Suisse merger - while stabilizing - was forced by market conditions (not ideal scenario).
"Too big too fail" even more prevalent with merger.
Structural problem of lower interest rates in Europe the main cause of bank fragility.
Advantage of DIY Investor: Time horizon clarity. Time horizons are an important factor when creating a financial plan, and are relatively simple for the individual investor; are you planning for a twenty-year retirement? Thirty? Forty? It is not so simple for professional investors. Are investment decisions made based on quarterly performance reviews? Annual fee targets? The three-year minimum assessment window for professional fund managers? Conflicting time horizons compromises good decision making. All of us are susceptible to short-term thinking, but professional investors are especially vulnerable.
With the recent banking turmoil he hasn't made any changes to their portfolios. Their investments are for the long term. There is no soft or easy landing since there are too many variables at play in the economy. The Fed raises interest rates until things get broken and things are now pretty much broken in terms of confidence in the global economy. Therefore there may be one more interest rate increase followed by time to consider the effects. Then they may take action if things worsen. Yes there is a loss of confidence in the banking system but SVB was a disaster to begin with and Credit Suisse hasn't been in good shape since the financial crisis of 2008. The Feds and Central Banks took action on the weekend to add liquidity. They won't let the banking system fail but there are issues. Canadians don't need to worry about their banking system.
The economy in North America is still growing. Read the Trillion Dollar Triage. The bottom line is that the Fed has a dual mandate: take care of the economy and fight inflation. It is now pretty clear that the economy is slowing and inflation could come off a lot since interest rates went from 0 to 5% very quickly. The Fed cares about banking stocks but not much about the stock market overall.
The question was on Canadian banks. TD and Royal Bank have more exposure to the U.S. and may be able to buy up some regional banks. He prefers National Bank which is insulated from the present issues. Banks don't pay enough for deposits so people tend to look for other products elsewhere. He prefers Canadian banks over the U.S. ones.
Yes, valuations are high, but he owns Apple, MSFT, Google and Meta because they have catalysts to grow, high cash flows and moats. That's why investors are chasing them in this low-growth, unstable market. You must be there, but watch valuations too.
It's the disinflation formation: 2-year below 4%, commodities leading down as the Nasdaq outperforms the other indices. This week has cracked investor confidence. The reality is nobody is making money this year. The year started being long commodities and financials and those are not working. This will lead to less liquidity in the market, because investors will pull back their cash into there is clarity.
Worried about contagion from banking instability in the USA.
Unfortunate that investors reacting to fear.
Supports backstopping of banks to avoid major depression.
Confidence in banking system essential in order to avoid major pain in the economy.
Believes regulation should apply to all banks - not specific banks over others.
$30 billion investment into banking system is good as it signals commitment to supporting banking sector.