50% off Premium Yearly

Chairman at Strategic Analysis Corp
Member since: Oct '00 · 3220 Opinions
It will be really hard to bring down inflation to any great degree. So interest rates are likely to remain at these levels or close.
Historically, these interest rates are not bad. When he came into the business, if you had 3% on short-term rates it was awesome, and 5-6% mortgage rates were standard. Things are only high relative to what we've been seeing over the past 10 years. Outside of that, they're reasonable.
His firm constructs a Structural Valuation Analysis (SVA) chart, which implies that there's a form and structure to the way that prices get formed in the stock market. It applies to both stocks and to the market.
There's a broad downward trend to the chart. The first thing to ask is if you really want to be in a company whose balance sheet is disappearing under your feet? If it's cheap enough, sure. But otherwise, not particularly.
The key is the Fair Market Value (FMV), or intrinsic value, of the company. Every time the stock gets up there, it stops. That's characteristic of senior stocks. When he looks at a chart, he knows what a company can give him. ENB has come back to a very important point, which is 2x book, one of his structural resistance points. It hit there, and stepped back. Looks as though it's going down further. Too early to be in the stock. If it got around $42, he'd be more interested.
PE ratios are too close to call. Yield on CNR is about 2%, versus 1% for CP. No one's going to buy it for income. Looking at the FMV, the stock prices are so close for each, you really can't judge.
Big difference is the book value. CP looks so cheap on price to book because of accounting decisions on its Kansas City purchase. So he can't tell if that's real or not. When he looks at CNR's SVA chart, it has an easy downside in weak markets to about $116. That's not trivial.
Dead heat on a merry-go-round. Neither is reasonably attractive right now.
PE ratios are too close to call. Yield on CNR is about 2%, versus 1% for CP. No one's going to buy it for income. Looking at the FMV, the stock prices are so close for each, you really can't judge.
Big difference is the book value. CP looks so cheap on price to book because of accounting decisions on its Kansas City purchase. So he can't tell if that's real or not. When he looks at CNR's SVA chart, it has an easy downside in weak markets to about $116. That's not trivial.
Dead heat on a merry-go-round. Neither is reasonably attractive right now.
For people who don't want to take risk, it' not a bad time to sit on the sidelines. Intrinsic value of US growth stocks is relatively poor. Intrinsic value of Canadian stocks is pretty good, because our index is heavily weighted to oil/gas and banks.
At this juncture, you're doing a bit of gambling if you're in the stock market. There's a bubble building in the AI stocks. We've seen this before. You can have a lot of fun, but when they come down, remember Nortel. Go for value, but this is a gambler's market.
Set back to a very strong technical support level. Earnings have been weak and FMV has been slipping. Nice yield. As long as it holds around $25-26, you should be all right. If it doesn't, could go to $19. Fairly long history of holding at 2x book or better. Good company, well run.